Babies exposed to levels of air pollution within EU standards develop poorer lung function as children and teenagers, according to research presented at the European Respiratory Society International Congress.  The study also suggests that some of the risk from exposure to pollution can be reduced if babies are breastfed for at least 12 weeks.
A second study presented at the Congress  shows that adults who are exposed to air pollution, even at low levels, over a period of decades are more likely to develop asthma.
Researchers say their findings indicate that more needs to be done to reduce levels of air pollution to protect children’s developing lungs and prevent asthma in adults.
The first study was presented by Dr Qi Zhao from IUF – Leibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine in Düsseldorf, Germany. He told the virtual conference: “Evidence is growing that exposure to air pollution is a threat to children’s respiratory health. However, most studies have looked at the effects of recent exposure to pollution.
“Babies’ lungs are especially vulnerable because they are growing and developing, so we wanted to see if there are longer-term impacts for babies who are exposed to air pollution as they grow up.”
The study included 915 children living in two regions of Germany: Munich and Wesel. The children had tests to measure their breathing at the ages of six, ten or 15 years. The tests recorded how much air they could breathe out after taking their deepest breath (called forced vital capacity, or FVC) and how much air they could breathe out in one second (called forced expiratory volume in one second, or FEV1). When these measurements are lower it suggests that breathing is restricted or obstructed and can indicate conditions such as asthma.
Researchers compared these measures with estimates of the levels of pollution in the areas where the children lived in the first year of life, taking account of other factors that are linked to poorer lung function, such as whether the children’s mothers smoked.
They found that the higher the levels of air pollution babies were exposed to, the worse their lung function was as they grew into children and teenagers. They saw an even bigger impact on lung function in children who developed asthma. The results also suggested some of the damage linked to air pollution was reduced in babies who were breastfed.
Dr Zhao added: “Our results suggest that babies who grow up breathing polluted air, even at levels below EU regulations, have poorer breathing as they grow into children and adults. This is worrying because previous research suggests that damage to lungs in the first year of life can affect respiratory health throughout life.”
The second study included 23,000 Danish nurses who were recruited to the study in either 1993 or 1999. Researchers used data from the country’s National Patient Register to see whether the nurses were ever referred for asthma treatment. They compared this information with levels of two air pollutants – nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and particulate matter smaller than 2.5 microns (PM2.5) – and the levels of road traffic noise where the nurses lived. The researchers took into account other factors that are linked to asthma, such as smoking and obesity.
They found that while noise pollution was not linked to rates of asthma, there was a link between long-term exposure to air pollution and the likelihood of being diagnosed with asthma. There was a 29% rise in asthma risk for each increase in PM2.5 of 6.3 micrograms per cubic metre. And there was a 16% rise in asthma risk for each increase of NO2 of 8.2 micrograms per cubic metre.
The levels of air pollution that the nurses were exposed to was relatively low compared to many European cities, averaging around 18.9 micrograms per cubic metre for PM2.5 and 12.8 micrograms per cubic metre for NO2. The current European standards for PM2.5 and NO2 are 25 and 40 micrograms per cubic metre, respectively.
The research was presented by Shuo Liu from University of Copenhagen, Denmark. He told the conference: “The fact that we found a link with asthma, even at relatively low levels of exposure, suggests that there is no safe threshold for air pollution. This is strong evidence that our regulations on air pollution need to be stricter if we want to prevent cases of asthma.”
Thierry Troosters, who was not involved in the study, is President of the European Respiratory Society and Professor in Rehabilitation Sciences at KU Leuven, Belgium. He said: “These studies are concerning because they suggest the air we breathe is having a detrimental effect on adults and on babies’ developing lungs. We all want to breathe clean air, and parents want to do all they can to help their children grow up to be healthy, but we have limited control over the quality of air where we live.
“These findings suggest that current regulations, such as the EU limit values for air pollution, are not safe enough and we need to do more to protect children from the potential harms of air pollution. Previous research has shown that up to 67,000 cases of childhood asthma could be avoided every year in Europe if countries would meet the World Health Organization air quality limit values, which are lower than the EU’s current standards, so it is essential that we reduce exposures. Collectively these data – along with others – feed into the ongoing discussions among the WHO and in Europe to adapt the air quality recommendations.”
Notes to editors
 Abstract no: OA4982 “Early-life exposure to air pollution and lung function development into adolescence: the GINIplus/LISA birth cohorts”, by Qi Zhao et al; Presented in session, “Origins of respiratory diseases: does early life exposure and diet really matter?” at 10:40 hrs CEST, Wednesday 9 September 2020.
 Abstract no: PA429 “Long-term exposure to air pollution, road traffic noise and asthma incidence: the Danish Nurse Cohort”, by Shuo Liu et al; Presented in session, “Determinants of chronic respiratory diseases” on Monday 24 August 2020.
The European Respiratory Society (ERS) International Congress is the once-a-year occasion when the world’s respiratory experts meet to present and discuss the latest research on topics such as asthma, COPD, lung cancer, pollution and smoking. Due to coronavirus, the Congress is going virtual for the first time ever, with over 25,000 participants from all over the world taking part in the exchange of scientific and clinical excellence across the entire field of respiratory medicine. The reputation of ERS derives from the outstanding scientific programme of its International Congress, which is now the largest respiratory meeting in the world. https://erscongress.org